Position: Home > Reading Notes > Mobile Visit: yjnnfood.com

1000 words after reading "On War"

时间:2016-08-24 Source: yjnnfood.com Time: 2016-08-24

1000 words after reading "On War"

Clausewitz's "On War" is the pinnacle of military theory in the 19th century, and it is also a great work comparable to the ancient Chinese military book "Sun Tzu". In addition, "On War" is the first work in the history of military thought to systematically summarize the experience of war using the dialectical methods of German classical philosophy, so it has very important military academic value. This work not only lays the foundation of modern Western bourgeois military science, but also is one of the important sources of Marxist military science.

Clausewitz is a Prussian military theorist and the founder of modern Western military theory. He has studied more than 130 cases of warfare that occurred between 1566 and 1815, summarized the experience of several wars that he experienced, and based on this he wrote a large-scale and rich military theoretical work-- " On War.

Non-military people may not have read "On War" systematically, but I believe most people are familiar with the famous saying "Military is a political relationship", which comes from "On War". "War" is the crystallization of Clausewitz's observation, research and analysis of war. It is both a military theoretical work and a philosophical work. It is hailed as a classic of modern western military theory and has played a significant role in the formation and development of modern western military thought.

Author Clausewitz, General Prussia, is known as the first person to study the war and really explore its roots. He was also the first to adopt a theory that can be applied to any stage of military history. He participated in the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars very early, and later entered the Berlin Army University. He had been a prisoner of war for Napoleon's army, and he entered various battles a year later. In 1818 he was promoted to major general and head of his alma mater. In 1830 he left the military academy to take over as artillery training director. This military philosophical book is a combination of the results of his historical research and his war experience into a complete set of concepts. After his sudden death, his widow was found in a sealed package. Krasewitz has repeatedly emphasized that his principle is not dogma, yjnnfood.com, but a guide to action. — "Educate the minds of future war leaders, or provide guidance in their self-education, but not accompany him on the battlefield." Sound theory is not a substitute for creative practice. This is the consistent insistence of Clausewitz! After the fire of World War I and World War II, despite the limitations of the author's inevitable timing, this book is still listed as a classic by most military academies in the world, and is outstanding in the world. Military strategist and politician. Clausewitz was thought to have really touched the nature of the war, and he was not meant to predict the future. This book is philosophy, not code. — "People who study war in all things, whether soldiers or literati, should have some understanding."

1000 words after reading "On War"

Where did the origin or sprout of war begin? Will the term war disappear from our dictionary? After reading "On War", I only get part of the answer, and part of the answer may never be known.

The war is the result of the infinite enlargement of the struggle between the enemy and us. On the battlefield, I fight with the enemy in order to survive. I will do everything possible to defeat the enemy. The fighting skills and weapon status may determine my life and death. Countless soldiers like me to fight and defeat the enemy, that is, the state of a nation, the state of the nation's weapons, the overall quality of the soldier, the formation, and tactics determine the victory or defeat of a war. Therefore, when the cannons and guns of the Western powers were used against the wooden ships of the Qing Dynasty, the big blades had an absolute advantage and they could naturally win the war.

So where did the war originate? There were few people in ancient times. There was no war. Only two savages fought or dueled for a female savage, just like animals for mating, but in fact, for the continuation of survival. With the growth of the population, there have been battles between tribes and tribes, races and races, countries and nations. In the final analysis, it is still for one purpose, a better development, and the purpose of survival. For example, Japan's expansion is to adapt to the increase in population. All wars cannot escape such a purpose. From primitive conquest to modern politics. All are for the benefit. Without it, no one is willing to fight. The war is doomed to failure, and there is never a winner. The so-called victory is simply adding its losses to the enemy. So war is a means of politics, a process of obtaining benefits and bleeding.

Human beings exist in the world, and if there is no restraint of their own desires, there will always be struggles. The small class conflicts the interests of the class within the country, and the big country lives and dies. War will be related to the ideological state of human beings. Human beings have always been asking for, from nature, to countries where they have the ability to conquer (so colonies, slaves). God has limited ability, but man has unlimited desires. (After reading the net yjnnfood.com)

Therefore, war sprouts from human desires. As society progresses and the country has a political system, war has become a tool for rulers to obtain greater benefits. How shameful is humanity from the destruction of the Six Kingdoms of the Qin Dynasty to the Second World War that did not escape from this scope and forcibly seized the rights of other nations to develop (the colonial requirements, the concessions, customs duties, huge war compensations) under the banner of strong national rejuvenation. !! And war has become a means of politics and a tool for other countries to intervene in other countries.

And whether war can disappear lies in whether human society can truly be united together. There is no national border or racial discrimination, so that education can really play a role, and we realize that we are all humans. Only then can war really disappear from the dictionary.

From the perspective of politics, "War Theory" believes that politics dominates war, war is only means, and politics is the purpose. This is correct. Recognizing this, we can grasp it more effectively when we look at a war. We don't need to consider the motto, "Forgetting war will be dangerous, and war will die." Remembering the purpose of politics can deeply understand the war, which is probably the case of the US-Iraq war. The ultimate destination of mankind should still be a Datong society. I hope that we can understand the nature of war.

The Chinese love peace, we don't want war, but if you think we are bullying and you have the ability to conquer, then come on, we accept the challenge. You measure the world with your values, and I will return your values to you. Those who committed my big man by the end of the day will be frightened.

At the same time, don't forget a sentence: soldiers, national affairs, life and death, the way of survival, we must not forget. --"The Art of War"

1000 words after reading "On War"

When it comes to Clausewitz's On War, it seems to talk about classics, what are classics, and how to treat classics.

The so-called classics, according to the "Modern Chinese Dictionary" interpretation, when the classics are used as nouns, there are two kinds of reference: the first is "traditional and authoritative works"; From the perspective of the definition of the word classic in various countries, we can conclude that what is called a classic should have the following points: historical accumulation, broad identity, and cultural influence. First of all, classics become classics because they have a deep history.

A newly-published book, even if it is very popular, attracts attention, and hits the spotlight, is at best a best-selling book, even a masterpiece, but it cannot be called a classic. Second, classics are classics, which is the result of identification. It relies on its own thinking power to make people feel awe of it. Although this kind of identification is sometimes subject to political coercion, it is mainly derived from the inherent ideological authority of the classics.

Third, the classics have a broad and far-reaching influence on the cultural field in which it is located. Clausewitz's On War is a well-deserved classic. There are two attitudes towards classics. One is classic worship and the other is scientific treatment.

At present, I can only adopt the first attitude. Clausewitz was born in Bourg near Madburg in 1780 and participated in the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars very early. He spent a lot of time comparing his personal observations during the Napoleonic Wars, and studied the war history of Gustav, Charles XII, and Frederick the Great. He believed that military principles could only be derived from a precise analysis of history.

To clarify, this "On War" I read is a so-called new edition of Guangxi Normal University. It is an excerpt. The Commercial Press is a three-volume edition, a lengthy masterpiece. I really ca n’t rely on an excerpt, and read like this in a fancy way, to get Clausewitz ’s military thought, and its place in military history, etc., these are not what I can do Yes, I only know some of his opinions from some passages and the research results of others. The subject of this book is not strategy or tactics, but "war" itself. War is "a kind of violence with the intention to force the other side to realize our will."

That is, war is a violent act, and this "violent act" is only a means, and it can never be an end. The purpose of the war was to enable the enemy to accept our intentions and yield to our will, and was "a continuation of other means of national policy."

Welcome to reprint and share after reading: http://yjnnfood.com/zw/1051823.html

Previous: 1000 Words After Reading Win or Win

Other netizens are watching:
User reviews
Heat: ℃